Thursday, February 21, 2019

 

Automated Intuit Notification


Stop waiting weeks for checks to arrive.


Intuit QuickBooks
Dear Intuit User,
 This notification has been sent to you by Intuit Inc. Please click the web link listed below to see Receipt.

Your Intuit Invoice ID: INV0524690 has been settled and available below.
Get details  here
We appreciate your business with us and thank you so much for working with Intuit.
Need help?.
Call 800-267-3519
See tutorials
Chat with a Pro
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn
Download the QuickBooks App for iOS on the App store Get the QuickBooks App for Android on Google Play


Intuit and Mint are trademarks of Intuit Inc.
Conditions, the prices and services are subject to modification without notification.
Additional privacy.
2003-2018 Intuit Services.  All rights reserved..
2700 E. Commerce Place, Tucson, AZ 84504
TrustE Verified
                                                           

Thursday, February 14, 2019

 

You got notification from DocuSign Service

 
 

 
DocuSign
Please review and sign this invoice.
Dear Receiver,

Please sign this invoice
This is an automatically created notice.

This message holds a secure information. Do not show this link with others.

Additional Signing Method
Please visit DocuSign.com, click 'Access Documents', enter the code: F8DE79CE17

About DocuSign
Sign documents in just minutes. It is risk-free. If you're at work, at home or even across the globe -- Our service provides a trusted solution for Digital Transaction Management.

Questions regarding an Invoice?
If you need to edit an invoice or have inquiries about the details in the document, please contact the sender directly.

If you cannot see the document, please see the Help page on our support .
 

This message was sent to you by DocuSign Electronic Signature Service.

 

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

 

This is an electronic efax Notice

 
 

eFax_Faxing_Simplified

Fax Message Caller-ID: 4136 685 4758,

You have received a 6 page(s) fax at 02-13-2018 04:26:54 GMT.

*The personal reference number is ds5_sic29-08637069974471-4369994-58.

Please visit www.efax.com/efax-help-center if you have any questions regarding this message or service.



eFax Staff

j2 footer
2007-2018 j2 Global, Inc. and affiliates.
eFax is a registered trademark of j2 Global, Inc.
72385 Hollywood Ave, Los Angeles, CA 97716

*** This is an automatically generated message, please do not reply directly to this email address *** Privacy Policy.


 

You've received efax Notice

 
 

eFax_Faxing_Simplified

Fax Message ID: 8274 742 4319,

You've received a 4 page(s) fax at 02-13-2018 10:56:56 GMT.

*The reference # is fj3_drd02-44547938382321-3839572-50.

Please visit www.efax.com/efax-help-center if you have any questions relating to this notification or service.



The eFax Staff

j2 footer
2006-2018 j2 Global, Inc. and affiliates. All rights reserved.
eFax is a trademark of j2 Global, Inc.
85299 Hollywood St, Los Angeles, CA 98625

*** This is an automatically generated message, please do not reply directly to this email address *** Privacy Policy.


Tuesday, February 12, 2019

 

USPS Package Delivery Unsuccessful Attempt Notification





en-US

Hello,

Package delivery unsuccessful attempt notification on February 6th, 2019 , 11:15 AM.

The delivery attempt was unsuccessful due to the fact that nobody was present at the delivery address, so this notice has been automatically sent. You can rearrange shipping by seeing your nearest USPS with the printed invoice specified down below. In case the parcel is NOT arranged for redelivery within 48 hours, it will be shipped back to the shipper.

Download Invoice


To learn more about Shipping and delivery, visit the Informed Delivery FAQs.

Get USPS Mobile?�
Image of the Google Play Icon. Image of the App Store Icon.


USPS.com| Privacy Policy| Customer Service| FAQs

This is an electronic e-mail don't reply to this letter. This message is for the chosen individual only and may contain private or private information. If you have received it in error, please remove. Any other use of the e mail by you is not allowed.

ReplyReply AllForwardEdit as new

 

USPS Delivery Unsuccessful Attempt Notification





en-US

Hi,

Package delivery attempt fail notification on February 6th, 2019 , 10:16 AM.

The delivery attempt failed because no one was present at the shipping address, so this notification was automatically sent. You may arrange redelivery by seeing your nearest United States Postal Service with the printed invoice provided down below. If the parcel is NOT scheduled for redelivery or picked up in 48 hrs, it will be to the sender.

Download Invoice


To find out a lot more about Informed Shipping and delivery, go to the Informed Delivery Guidelines .

Get USPS Apps
Image of the Google Play Icon. Image of the App Store Icon.


USPS.com| Privacy| Customer support| Help Center

This is an electronic e-mail do not respond to this letter. This note is for the chosen recipient only and may possibly consist of private or personal information. If perhaps you have obtained it in error, please delete. Any use of the e-mail by you is prohibited.

ReplyReply AllForwardEdit as new

Saturday, December 30, 2017

 

New book, 'Sex Difference Explained: From DNA to Society -- Purging Gene Copy Errors', explains how/why biology is essential for understanding men-women, not least for anti-feminists

BRAND NEW. November 2016 (book) Sex Difference Explained: From DNA to Society -- Purging Gene Copy ErrorsThis is a 'bottom-up' from biology cutting-edge holistic understanding of men/ women: a layman's guide to the converging lines of evidence for profound male-female distinction serving complementarity.

The book explains, bottom-up from biology why: Domestic violence is mostly, indeed overwhelmingly female-perpetrated – the hormonal basis of female preference for violence in a couple context, and brain circuitry re male 'backing off' have been uncovered. *Women owe men after marriage break up, not the other way round – pair-bonding being nothing to do with provisioning in origin, having evolved in the female interest to ward off most males and increase female overall quality of reproductive output. There is no such thing as misogyny – zero scientific evidence; it's quite the reverse: from childhood, both sexes feel more positive towards females, and this becomes more pronounced in men than in women. *Women are not 'oppressed' in any way by men – there is no form of dominance interaction across sex. Females are always privileged – they're the 'limiting factor' in reproduction. There is prejudice against males – 'policing' of male access to sex.

A monograph for the New Male Studies journal, it's available on Amazon.co.uk & Amazon.com in both paperback & Kindle versions; plus it's open-access on the NMS website. 

Amazon US paperback http://tinyurl.com/h8s5ujs Kindle eBook http://tinyurl.com/gwtsdpo Amazon UK paperback http://tinyurl.com/zh3cnux Kindle eBook http://tinyurl.com/hlxg5ko

This is the first time anyone has properly attempted to put forward a truly integrated account of human sociality, utilising all the latest lines of evidence in theory re male hierarchy, female 'personal network', the very different in-grouping according to sex, and pair-bonding.

The core argument is that all major aspects of male-female human sociality necessarily stem from biological principles; which all arise in solving the core problem faced by all life-forms: the relentless build-up of mistakes in the repeated copying of genes.

Explanation here has to be bottom-up, not top-down, because that is the direction of causation: all else is feedback, which in inherent in any system if it is to avoid breakdown. Culture – that is, the facility to have and behave in this way – could not have evolved unless its function is to feed back to and fine-tune the very underlying biology that gave rise to it. So the more complex the organism becomes, then the better it gets at being faithful to and expressing its biology. The notion that instead somehow we go off on a novel tangent and 'escape' biology is the very opposite of what happens.

To deal with all the accumulated gene replicatio_nError, the 'bad' genes somehow have to be filtered out, and this is the function of the male: why males came into being, and why men so fiercely compete with one another to form a hierarchy.

The female contribution to this 'genetic filter' mechanism is carefully to choose only the most dominant/prestigious males, cross-checking that indeed they do possess the best gene sets. This ensures genetic mutations and other errors that would seriously compromise reproduction are purged from the local gene pool.

With men tied to a hierarchy, women evolved to 'marry out' to avoid in-breeding. In preparation for this, girls have a very different social organisation, rehearsing for when later they have to make close bonds with non-kin, stranger-females for mutual child-care. This explains why female grouping is so tight and exclusionary, whereas males group all-inclusively.

Pair-bonding serves to exclude lower-ranked, whilst allowing access by still higher-ranked males; and to provide a serial father of children, thereby in effect projecting forward in time a woman's peak fertility, compensating for her deteriorating store of eggs, and consequent declining fertility and attractiveness. But although this is clearly all in the female interest, the male also gets something out of 'marriage': a more fertile partner than he would be able to acquire for 'no-strings' (promiscuous) sex. It's cross-sex bargaining.

The upshot is that there's an underlying sex dichotomy, to be sure; but it's perfectly complementary, with the sexes of equal importance in what amounts to a symbiosis.






 

WHY BIOLOGY IS CRUCIAL FOR ANTI-FEMINISTS. New book. Sex Difference Explained: From DNA to Society -- Purging Gene Copy Errors



The book explains, bottom-up from biology why: * Domestic violence is mostly, indeed overwhelmingly female-perpetrated – the hormonal basis of female preference for violence in a couple context, and brain circuitry re male 'backing off' have been uncovered. *Women owe men after marriage break up, not the other way round – pair-bonding being nothing to do with provisioning in origin, having evolved in the female interest to ward off most males and increase female overall quality of reproductive output. * There is no such thing as misogyny – zero scientific evidence; it's quite the reverse: from childhood, both sexes feel more positive towards females, and this becomes more pronounced in men than in women. *Women are not 'oppressed' in any way by men – there is no form of dominance interaction across sex. * Females are always privileged – they're the 'limiting factor' in reproduction. * There is prejudice against males – 'policing' of male access to sex.

The book is a 'bottom-up' from biology cutting-edge holistic understanding of men/ women: a layman's guide to the converging lines of evidence for profound male-female distinction serving complementarity.

A monograph for the New Male Studies journal, it's available on Amazon.co.uk & Amazon.com in both paperback & Kindle versions; plus it's open-access on the NMS website. 

Amazon US paperback http://tinyurl.com/h8s5ujs Kindle eBook http://tinyurl.com/gwtsdpo Amazon UK paperback http://tinyurl.com/zh3cnux Kindle eBook http://tinyurl.com/hlxg5ko

This is the first time anyone has properly attempted to put forward a truly integrated account of human sociality, utilising all the latest lines of evidence in theory re male hierarchy, female 'personal network', the very different in-grouping according to sex, and pair-bonding.

The core argument is that all major aspects of male-female human sociality necessarily stem from biological principles; which all arise in solving the core problem faced by all life-forms: the relentless build-up of mistakes in the repeated copying of genes.

Explanation here has to be bottom-up, not top-down, because that is the direction of causation: all else is feedback, which in inherent in any system if it is to avoid breakdown. Culture – that is, the facility to have and behave in this way – could not have evolved unless its function is to feed back to and fine-tune the very underlying biology that gave rise to it. So the more complex the organism becomes, then the better it gets at being faithful to and expressing its biology. The notion that instead somehow we go off on a novel tangent and 'escape' biology is the very opposite of what happens.

To deal with all the accumulated gene replicatio_nError, the 'bad' genes somehow have to be filtered out, and this is the function of the male: why males came into being, and why men so fiercely compete with one another to form a hierarchy.

The female contribution to this 'genetic filter' mechanism is carefully to choose only the most dominant/prestigious males, cross-checking that indeed they do possess the best gene sets. This ensures genetic mutations and other errors that would seriously compromise reproduction are purged from the local gene pool.

With men tied to a hierarchy, women evolved to 'marry out' to avoid in-breeding. In preparation for this, girls have a very different social organisation, rehearsing for when later they have to make close bonds with non-kin, stranger-females for mutual child-care. This explains why female grouping is so tight and exclusionary, whereas males group all-inclusively.

Pair-bonding serves to exclude lower-ranked, whilst allowing access by still higher-ranked males; and to provide a serial father of children, thereby in effect projecting forward in time a woman's peak fertility, compensating for her deteriorating store of eggs, and consequent declining fertility and attractiveness. But although this is clearly all in the female interest, the male also gets something out of 'marriage': a more fertile partner than he would be able to acquire for 'no-strings' (promiscuous) sex. It's cross-sex bargaining.

The upshot is that there's an underlying sex dichotomy, to be sure; but it's perfectly complementary, with the sexes of equal importance in what amounts to a symbiosis.



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?